NUR602 WEEK 7 CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION

CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION GUIDELINES

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NUR602 WEEK 7 CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for learners to:

· Have the
opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout all core
courses in the FNP track and previous clinical courses.

· Demonstrate
an advancing understanding of the care of women and children.

· Demonstrate
the ability to analyze previous patients seen in the clinical setting be able
to perform an evidenced-based review of their case, diagnosis, and plan, while
guiding and taking feedback from peers regarding the case

· Demonstrate
professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of
peers.

Course Outcomes

1. Integrate
current evidence based clinical practice guidelines in the care of childbearing
and childrearing families.

2. Appropriately
apply anticipatory guidance and health promotion in the care of childbearing
and childrearing families.

3. Assess growth
and developmental milestones in the care of childbearing and childrearing
families.

4. Construct an
evidence based reproductive health management plan.

5. Identify and
address healthcare needs of marginalized childbearing and childrearing families

Requirements

For Week 7 of the course you will be presenting your own
case from clinical. The case should be
clear, organized, and meet the following guidelines:]

Initial Case Presentation:

The initial presentation should include BOTH the subjective
and objective data on the patient organized as you would organize them in a
SOAP (CC, HPI – in paragraph format (no OLDCART); ROS, PE findings, and any lab
or diagnostic findings for your patient.

**Do not put the diagnosis or plan in initial post.

WEEK 7: The case should be women’s health (meaning a case
relating to some aspect of women’s healthcare, unique to women).

WEEK 7 specific guidelines:
The case should include some aspect of one the following – contraceptive
management, sexuality, sexual health, menses or complaint thereof, pubertal
development in a female, a well woman exam, STD, vaginitis, perineal skin
changes, breast health or breast complaint, pregnancy, pre-conceptual health, post-partum
health/problem, or a complaint thereof, or a disease specific to women or found
in greater frequency in women. This
might include a disease such as post-partum depression. Please do not use UTI.

Leading the Discussion:
Post your subjective, objective, and diagnostic data for your patient by
Tuesday at 11:59 PM MT.

Interactive Dialogue:
As a student you will also be required to respond to at least two (2)
other students initial case presentation. In your responses, you must include
the following: Your top three (3) differentials based on the information
provided, the primary diagnosis you are leaning toward, how you would treat
that diagnosis. Use references to support your response. *DEADLINE – YOUR
RESPONSES TO 2 STUDENTS ARE DUE BY FRIDAY AT 11:59 p.m. (MT). **If all students have a response, then
choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

Clinical Case Presentation Summary Criteria:

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, post a summary reply to your
initial post and respond to any faculty questions to your initial posting or
question(s) posed to the general class. Use references to support all of your
responses.

Criteria for Summary Post should include all of the
following required elements: Summary post written in paragraph(s) type format
(No SOAP); discuss primary and any applicable secondary diagnoses along with
treatment plan for each diagnosis.
Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the
listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each
treatment plan. Differential diagnoses
are eliminated.

*Remember not to use any patient identifiers in your posting
(this would be full names or disclosure of clinic name, preceptor name, et
cetera). Please include age, gender, and
race.

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Total Points Possible = 100

Application of Course Knowledge

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

12 Points

0 Points

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives/insights
applicable to the results from the physical exam and data.

Initial presentation in paragraph format using the following
elements:

· chief
complaint/concern,

· HPI –
narrative/paragraph type format. (No
OLDCART)

· ROS –

· PE

· Lab and/or
diagnostic data, or statement that data was unavailable at time of visit/follow
up

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or
insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing ONE of the following: HPI,
CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or
insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing TWO of the following: HPI,
CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation contributes unique perspectives or
insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study:

Initial presentation is missing THREE of the following: HPI,
CC, ROS, PE, or Lab/diagnostic data

Case presentation offers no insight or application to the
case presentation.

Four or more elements of SOAP criteria expectation are
missing or not met.

Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

12 Points

0 Points

Case presentation discussion is supported by evidence from
four (4) appropriate sources –One from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and three
from Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published
within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is supported by three (3)
scholarly sources: at least one from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and two from
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published within
the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is supported by two (2)
scholarly sources: at least one from an EBP Clinical Guidelines and one from
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Chamberlain Online Library published within
the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Case presentation discussion is partially supported with one
scholarly source or include citations to non-scholarly/evidence based websites
as support.

Reference(s) listed and cited but does not fully support –
particularly diagnoses and treatment(s).

References used not published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are not provided.

Discussion posts contain no evidence-based practice
reference or citation from appropriate sources.

*Students should note that fictitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by
the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an
automatic ZERO (0) for this section for the week.

Organization

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and
understandable sequence.

Summary post is submitted by due date and includes all of
the following required elements: Summary post written in paragraph(s) type
format (No SOAP); discuss primary and any secondary diagnoses along with
treatment plan for each diagnosis.
Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the
listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each
treatment plan

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and
understandable sequence. However, summary post is missing one (1) of the
following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP); Discussion of primary
diagnosis; Any applicable secondary diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based
in-text citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and
evidence based in-text citation for each treatment plan.

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and
understandable sequence. However,
Summary post is missing two (2) of the following elements: use of correct
format (No SOAP); discussion of primary and any secondary diagnoses along with
treatment plan for each diagnosis.
Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation support for all of the
listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each
treatment plan

Presents case study in a logical, meaningful, and
understandable sequence. However,
summary post is missing three (3) of the following elements: use of correct
format (No SOAP). Discussion of primary
and any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation
support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text
citation for each treatment plan

Case presentation is unclear or not relevant to presenting
chief complaint/concern and HPI or summary post is missing four (4) or more of
the following elements: use of correct format (No SOAP). Discuss primary and
any secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation
support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text
citation for each treatment plan.

Interactive Dialogue

26 Points

23 Points

21 Points

10 Points

0 Points

Responds substantively to at least two topic-related post of
a peer including evidence from appropriate sources by Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT and
responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s initial post and all
questions posted in general to the class Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

· For each
peer response, Includes three appropriate differential diagnoses with rationale
and presumed diagnosis with treatment.

· Rationale
for each differential diagnosis and treatment plan is supported with in-text
citation using scholarly evidence.

Responds to at least two (2) student peers’ initial post but
the nature of one or more responses are not substantive or missing evidence
from appropriate sources to support responses.

and

Responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s
initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the Sunday
deadline.

Responds substantively to one (1) student peer’s initial
post with evidence from appropriate sources to support response.

and

Responds to faculty questions posted to the student’s
initial post and all questions posted to the class as a whole by the Sunday
deadline.

Responds to one (1) student peer’s initial post but the
nature of the responses is not substantive or missing evidence from appropriate
sources to support response.

and

Does not respond to faculty question(s) posted to the
student’s initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the
Sunday deadline.

Does not respond to any topic-related peer post by Friday
deadline and does not respond to faculty question(s) posted to the student’s
initial post and all questions posted in general to the class by the Sunday
deadline.

Grammar, Syntax, APA

4 points

3 points

2 points

1 point

0 points

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are
accurate, or with zero to one errors.

Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and
syntax noted.

Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and
syntax noted.

Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and
syntax noted.

Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar,
spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty
feedback.

Participation

Submits initial case presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT on
Tuesday; .

0 points deducted

Points deducted for late or missing posts

Submits initial case presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT on
Tuesday;

Ten percent (10%) for late initial case presentation
discussion post not posted by Tuesday, 11:59pm MT

Explanation & Answer

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

Similar Posts