NR701 Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles
Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR701 Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Research Articles Guidelines
Purpose
The student will compare quantitative and qualitative
research articles to determine how theory and research are linked, and how they
are utilized for nursing science.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following
course outcomes:
CO 4: Compare and contrast the difference and similarities
with selected characteristics of quantitative research designs. (PO#3)
CO 5: Evaluate appropriateness of qualitative research
design for a specific clinical practice question. (PO#3)
CO 6: Evaluate appropriateness of quantitative research
design for a specific clinical practice question. (PO#3)
Due Date: Submit by Sunday of the end Week 5 at 11:59 p.m.
MT.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 200 points.
Requirements
1. Review the
three categories below (highlighted), which include one quantitative and one
qualitative article. Select one category you are most interested in and use the
assigned articles under that category to complete your assignment.
Note the articles below may be found within the CCN library
by clicking on the links below each article.
If you need further instructions/help, visit the “Need Help”
or the “Ask a Librarian” sections of the library page associated with NR-701
Application of Analytic Methods”.
Category 1: Pressure Ulcers
Coyer, F., Gardner, A., Doubrovsky, A., Cole, R., Ryan, F.,
Allen, C., & McNamara, G. (2015). Reducing pressure ulcer injuries in
critically ill patients by using a patient skin integrity care bundle
(InSPiRE). American Journal of Critical Care, 24(3), 199-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015930
Roberts, S., McInnes, E., Wallis, M., Bucknall, T., Banks,
M., & Chaboyer, W. (2016). Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer
prevention care bundle: A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nursing, 15, 1-10.
doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0188-9
Category 2: Compassion Fatigue
Berg, G., Harshbarger, J., Ahlers-Schmidt, C., &
Lippoldt, D. (2016, January-February). Exposing compassion fatigue and burnout
syndrome in a trauma team: A qualitative study. Journal of Trauma Nursing,
23(1), 3-10. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000172
Kelly, L., & Lefton, C. (2017, November). Effect of
meaningful recognition on critical care nurses’ compassion fatigue. American
Journal of Critical Care, 26(6), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017471
Category 3: End- of-Life Care
Holms, N., Milligan, S., & Kydd, A. (2014). A study of
the lived experiences of registered nurses who have provided end-of-life care
within an intensive care unit. International Journal of Palliative Nursing,
20(11), 549-556. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2014.20.11.549
Potash, J., HY Ho, A., Chan, F., Wang, X., & Cheng, C.
(2014). Can art therapy reduce death anxiety and burnout in end-of-life care
workers? A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Palliative
Nursing, 20(5), 233-240. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2014.20.5.233
2. Submit a 6 page
APA-formatted paper (note a template for this assignment can be found in Course
Resources):
a. Include an
Introduction section entitled, Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative
Articles (centered, not bolded), that indicates the purpose of your paper
b. Compare and
contrast the articles with respect to (headings should be centered and bolded):
1. Research Design
2. Research
Question(s)
3. Sampling
Process and Sample Size
4. Methods for Data
Analysis
5. Adhering to
Ethical Standards
6. Reliability and
Validity (Rigor)
7.
Generalizability and Transferability of Findings
c. Summarization
(centered and bolded); share your own thoughts regarding the usefulness and
value of quantitative vs. qualitative research. Provide a rationale for your
opinions and explain how each research methodology can be used to support a
change in practice. Be sure to avoid the
use of 1st person terminology by referring to yourself as the DNP student or
the DNP learner, etc.
Directions and Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction
10
5%
Introduction paragraph is concise (approximately 5
sentences). A brief introduction is provided for each article being
critiqued. The purpose of the paper is
clearly conveyed/expressed through use of a formal purpose statement.
Research Design
20
10%
Compare and contrast the research designs from each article.
Critique appropriateness of the design used in relation to the research
questions being asked in each article. Provide evidence to support research
design appropriateness.
Research Questions
20
10%
Compare and contrast the research questions from the
standpoint of a quantitative versus a qualitative inquiry. How do they differ?
Sampling Process and Sample Size
20
10%
Compare and contrast the sampling process and size for each
article. For example, what type of population was used? How were subjects
recruited? What were inclusion and exclusion criteria, if any? Were the sample sizes for each article
sufficient? Why or why not?
Methods for Data Analysis
25
12.5%
Compare and contrast the methods for data analysis for each
article. For example, what statistical tests were performed by the quantitative
researchers and for what purpose where they used? How did the qualitative
researchers analyze the data they collected? Were the tests appropriate for the
type of data collected?
Ethical standards
20
10%
Compare and contrast the ethical standards described or
implied in each article. For example, what were the protections put into place
to protect human subjects or personal demographic data? Did the researchers
adhere to the standards, or were there any potential ethical considerations?
Reliability and validity (rigor)
20
10%
Compare and contrast the reliability/validity and rigor of
the methods reported in each article. For example, was the reliability/validity
of the quantitative instruments addressed? What did the qualitative researchers
do to ensure rigor in their study?
Generalizability, Transferability of findings
25
12.5%
Examine the generalizability of the findings from the
quantitative article. Were they any threats to external validity or internal
validity? Were they acknowledged? For
the qualitative article, address the transferability of the findings. Are the
findings credible? Why or why not?
Summarization
20
10%
Summarize your own thoughts regarding the usefulness of
quantitative and quantitative research when making a change in practice.
APA formatting, scholarly writing
20
10%
Adheres to the rules of APA formatting, scholarly writing,
spelling, and grammar.
Maintain paper within length requirements
Met/Not Met (Up to 10 points deducted if not met)
Up to 10% if Not Met
Adheres to the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-6 pages
(excluding title and reference pages).
Note up to 10 points can be deducted for going over or under the page
requirements for the assignment.
Total
200
100%
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
A
Outstanding or highest level of performance
B
Very good or high level of performance
C
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
D/F
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Introduction
10 points
Fully introduces both articles. Remains clear and concise
and includes formal purpose statement.
9-10 points
Mostly introduces both articles. Mostly remains clear and
concise and includes formal purpose statement.
8 points
Minimally introduces both articles. Formal purpose statement
is included.
7 points
Fails to introduce both articles. Introduction is unclear
and formal purpose statement is not included.
0-6 points
Research Design
20 points
Fully compares and contrasts the research design for each
article.
18-20 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the research design for each
article.
16-17 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the research design for
each article.
14-15 points
Fails to compare and contrast the research design for each
article.
0-13 points
Research Questions
20 points
Fully compares and contrasts the research questions for each
article in the context of their methodology.
18-20 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the research questions for
each article in the context of their methodology.
16-17 points
Minimally compares and contrasts research questions for each
article in the context of their methodology.
14-15 points
Fails to compare and contrast the research questions for
each article in the context of their methodology.
0-13 points
Sampling Process and Sample Size
20 points
Fully compares and contrasts the sample selection and size
for each article.
18-20 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the sample selection and size
for each article.
16-17 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the sample selection and
size for each article.
14-15 points
Fails to compare and contrast the sample selection and size
for each article.
0-13 points
Methods for Data Analysis
25 points
Fully compares and contrasts the methods of data analysis
for each article.
23 – 25 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the methods of data analysis
for each article.
21-22 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the methods of data
analysis for each article.
19-20 points
Fails to compare and contrast the methods of data analysis
for each article.
0-18 points
Ethical standards
20 points
Fully compares and contrasts the ethical standards for each
article.
18-20 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the ethical standards for each
article.
16-17 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the ethical standards for
each article.
14-15 points
Fails to compare and contrast the ethical standards for each
article.
0-13 points
Reliability and validity (rigor)
20 points
Fully compares and contrasts the reliability and validity
(rigor) for each article.
18-20 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the reliability and validity
(rigor) for each article.
16-17 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the reliability and
validity (rigor) for each article.
14-15 points
Fails to compare and contrast the reliability and validity
(rigor) for each article.
0-13 points
Generalizability, Transferability of findings
25 points
Fully compares and contrasts the generalizability and
transferability of findings for each article.
23-25 points
Mostly compares and contrasts the generalizability and
transferability of findings for each article.
21-22 points
Minimally compares and contrasts the generalizability and
transferability of findings for each article.
19-20 points
Fails to compare and contrast the generalizability and
transferability of findings for each article.
0-18 points
Summarization
20 points
Described in detail thoughts regarding qualitative and
quantitative research including rationale.
18-20 points
Described thoughts regarding qualitative and quantitative
research but provides little rationale.
16-17 points
Described thoughts regarding research but does not
discriminate between qualitative and quantitative, or gives weak rationale.
14-15 points
Failed to describe thoughts regarding qualitative and
quantitative research and gives no rationale.
0-13 points
APA formatting, scholarly writing
20 points
Writes in a scholarly manner with no grammar, spelling, or
syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
18-20 points
Writes in a scholarly manner with minimal grammar, spelling,
or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
16-17 points
Writes in a scholarly manner with several grammar, spelling,
or syntax errors. Breaks minor rules of rules of APA formatting.
14-15 points
Does not write in a scholarly manner. Has many errors in
grammar, spelling and syntax. Does not follow rules for APA formatting.
0-13 points
Maintains paper within length requirements (Up to 10 points
deducted if not met)
Adheres to the minimum/maximum page requirements of 4-6
pages (excluding title and reference pages).
No point deduction
Met
Paper is up to 1 page under or over the minimum/maximum page
requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
4-5 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met
Paper is 2 pages under or over the minimum/maximum page
requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
6-8 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met
Paper is 3 pages under or over the minimum/maximum page
requirements of 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference pages).
9-10 point deduction per faculty discretion
Not Met
Total Points Possible =
200 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.