Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic
that include pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical
Assessment

5

Discussed
typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3)
differential diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic
Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic
studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis.

Prevention
and Treatment Options

10

Discuss
prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.

Education

10

Discuss patient and
family education.

Identify
Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices
for optimal outcomes.

Lead
Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion
relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) discussion
question for peers.

Interactive
Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m.
MT, Interactive dialogue with at least two peer’s initial presentation by
responding substantively to all questions posed and citing related research
to support.

Summary
Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m.
MT, add summary post to own grand rounds presentation that summarizes the
discussion. Include conclusions from
the collective group discussion on the topic.

Evidence
Based Research/Articles

10

Include minimal of three
(3) evidence based research and/or Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain
Online Library.

Evidence
Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include a minimal of
two (2) current (within last 5 years)
EBP clinical guidelines.

Interactive
Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL
faculty directed questions on initial presentation. Includes scholarly
support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or peer reviewed journal articles
obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation
Development

5

Overall Presentation
is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in
accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura.
Labcoat and name badge are present.

Total

150

A quality assignment will meet or
exceed all of the above requirements.

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of
performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of
performance

Meets

Satisfactory
level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 150

Introduction

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic that
include a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Introduction
of chosen grand rounds topic, but omits one of the following criteria:
pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction
of chosen grand rounds topic but omits two of the following criteria: pathophysiology,
epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides
vague description of 1-2 of the following criteria of pathophysiology,
epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction
of chosen grand rounds topic but omits all three of the following criteria: pathophysiology,
epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides
vague description of all three (2) criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology
or risk factors.

Does not
present an Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic.

Clinical Assessment

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

Discusses
in detail typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

Describes
in general the clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

List of
clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen
topic and etiology.

Lists clinical
assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen topic
without inclusion of etiology.

Does
not describe clinical assessment findings.

Differential Diagnoses

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

List AND discuss in
detail a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical
guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level
resources.

List AND discuss in
detail two (2) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical
guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level
resources.

List three
differential diagnosesbut
does not include a discussionwith
scholarly support
from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate
provider-level resources

List two or less
differential diagnosesbut
does not include a discussionwith
scholarly support
from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate
provider-level resources

Does
not list and discuss differential diagnoses.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss
diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis and
rationale and scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based
articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss
diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with
rationale, but omits scholarly support from clinical guidelines,
research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss
diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with
scholarly support but omits rationale.

Vague
discussion of of diagnostic studies and labs used to confirm diagnosis, omits
both the rationales AND scholarly support from clinical. guidelines,
research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Does
not discuss diagnostic studies/labs.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss
prevention AND treatment options including first line medication and
non-pharmacological options.

Discuss
prevention AND treatment options including first line medication, does not
include non-pharmacological option(s).

Discuss
treatment options but does not include one of the following: first line
medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Discuss
treatment options but does not include two or more of the following: first
line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Does not
prevention and treatment options.

Education

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail
patient AND family education for chosen grand rounds topic with rationales.

Provides a general discussion of patient and
family education with rationales.

Lists
patient and family education instead of a discussion with rationales.

Lists
patient OR education instead of a discussion without inclusion of rationales.

OR

Information discussed is vague or unclear.

Does not discuss patient and family education.

Identify
Outcomes

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Describe
optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including
expected follow up care.

Describe
optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication. Omits expected
follow up care.

Incorrectly
identifies optimal outcomes after treatment. Includes expected follow up
care.

Incorrectly
identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication AND
omits expected follow up care.

Does not
address outcomes.

Lead
Discussion

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Fully, facilitate
discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open
discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply
additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Facilitate discussion relevant to the
presentation topic by incorporating at least two (2) discussion questions for
peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore
additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to
the presentation topic by incorporating at least one (1) discussion questions
for peers. Question posed allow students to apply additional concepts or
explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to
the presentation topic with two to three (2-3) questions BUT questions posed
does not allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional
information relevant to the topic.

Does not
lead discussion.

Interactive
Dialogue with Student Peers

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student
responds substantively with additional insight to at least two different peer
presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
responds to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT
but response is not substantively OR
does not add additional insight

Student
responds substantively with additional insight to at least one different peer
presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
responds to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT
but response is not substantively OR
does not add additional insight

Student
does not participate in interactive dialogue by Sunday, 11:59pm MT

Summary
Requirement

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

By
Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds
presentation that summarizes the discussion.
Includes conclusions from thecollective
group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday
11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation
with conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic but
information presented is not clear or difficult to follow.

By Sunday
11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary to the original grand rounds presentation but
omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday
11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary BUT
does not summarizes the initial discussion ANDomits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the
topic

Student
does not post a summary by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Evidence
Based Research/Articles

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Include three (3)
evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library.

Include two (2) evidence based research or
Peer Reviewed articles current (within
last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Include one (1) evidence based research or
Peer Reviewed articles current (within
last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Includes two or more articles for support but
articles are not research or peer-reviewed from Chamberlain Online Library

OR

Two or more articles are older than 5 years

Does not
include evidence based research or peer reviewed articles from Chamberlain
Online Library

Evidence
Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Include a minimal of
two (2) current (within last 5 years)
EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes a minimal of two (2) EBP clinical
guidelines but guidelines presented are older than 5 years.

Includes one (1) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes one (1) EBP clinical guidelines but
guidelines presented is older than 5 years.

Does not
present evidence based practice guidelines.

Interactive
Dialogue with Faculty

10
Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student
responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed
questions. This includes question(s)
to the individual student and any questions posed to the class as a whole by
Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
responds substantively to at least one faculty directed questions by Sunday
11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
responds to two or more faculty directed questions, but post is not
substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
responds to only one faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively
by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student
does not participate in interactive dialogue with faculty by Sunday 11:59 p.m.
MT.

Presentation
Development

5
Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

Overall presentation
is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in
accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Lab
coat and name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but
missing one (1) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical
scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded
in Kaltura, no lab coat, no name badge not present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but
missing two (2) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical
scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded
in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but
missing three (3) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical
scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded
in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is not clear OR missing
four or more of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship
in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name
badge present.

Total Points

of 150 points