NR541 Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS)

Assignment Criteria

Points

%

Description

Introduction

34

23%

Theintroductionintroducesthetopicof
the scope and standards of informatics practice, inclusive ofNIfunctional
areas,andtheintervieweenamesthekeysections
ofthepaper.
No names are included to protect identity and privacy.

Interview Results

34

23%

Keyelementsoftheinterviewaresummarized
withanemphasisondescribingthree
primaryNIfunctionalareas, practice within the scope and
standards of NI practiceinwhichtheintervieweepractices, as well as
interdisciplinary/interprofessional efforts.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Analysis

34

23%

Differencesandsimilarities
betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctionalareas
and scope and standards of practice
andactualpracticeof the intervieweeareclearlyanalyzedinthestudent’sownwords,with
depth,and analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Conclusion

33

22%

Concludingstatementsclearly
includethewriter’suniqueinsightsaboutNIfunctionalareasandthepracticeofnursinginformaticsgained
fromcompletingthisassignment.

APA Formats

5

3%

Text,title
page,andreferencepage(s)areconsistentwithAPAformat(zero to threeerrors).

Citations

5

3%

Ideasandinformationfrom
othersourcesarecited
andarecited
correctly(zero to three errors).

Writing
Mechanics

5

3%

Rulesofgrammar,spelling,wordusage,andpunctuationareconsistentwith
formalwrittenwork(zero to threeerrors),
paper meets page length.

Total

150

100%

Assignment
Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of
performance

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of
performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Introduction

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Introduction clearly
introducesthetopicofNIfunctionalareas,
identifiestheintervieweebyrole (not name)andtypeoforganization,
andnamesthekeysectionsofthepaper.

Introduction
clearlypresentsonlytwo oftherequired
sections.

Introduction
clearlypresentsonlyone oftherequired
sections.

Introduction
doesnotclearly
addressanyofthethreerequiredsections.

Nointroductionispresent.

Interview

Results

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Key elements of the interview are summarized
with the three primary NI functional areas of INS practice described clearly.

Exemplars of
interdisciplinary/interprofessional collaboration are included.

Scholarly support.is present and relevant. .

Key elements of the interview are summarized.
The NI functional areas in which the interviewee practices are mentioned but
not clearly described.

Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional
collaboration is mentioned but not elaborated.

Scholarly sources are provided but support is not clearly stated

Functional areas of practice are not
addressed

OR

There is no mention of Interdisciplinary/
interprofessional role or collaboration.

Scholarly sources are present but support is not
well-established.

Key elements of the interview are not
present,

OR

the interview summary lacks scholarly
support.

Interview results are not present.

Analysis

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Differencesand/orsimilarities
betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional
areasandactual
practiceofthose
functionalareasareclearlyanalyzedin-depth.

Theanalysisissupportedby

scholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities
betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional
areasandactual
practiceofthose
functionalareasareanalyzedsuperficially. Analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities
betweenpublished
descriptionsofNIfunctionalareasandactualpracticeofthosefunctionalareasarepresentedbutnotanalyzed.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Differencesand/orsimilarities
betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional
areasandactual
practiceofthose
functionalareasare

notpresented,

ORscholarlysupportisnotpresentinthissection.

An
analysis is not present.

Conclusion

33 Points

29 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Concluding
statements clearly include the writer’s unique insights about NI functional
areas and the practice of nursing informatics gained from completing this assignment.

Concluding
statements include statements about NI functional areas and the practice of
nursing informatics, but lack clear presentation of the writer’s unique
insights gained from completing this assignment.

Conclusion
partially addresses either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion
is present but does not address either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion
is not present.

APA Formats

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to twoerrors
ofAPAformatintext,title
page,andreference
page(s).

Three to fiveAPAformaterrors
intext,titlepage,
andreference page(s).

Six to sevenAPAformaterrors
intext,titlepage,
orreference page(s).

Nine or moreAPAformaterrorsin
text,titlepage,or
referencepages(s).

Citations

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Allideasandinformation
fromothersourcesarecited.

One to threeinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom
othersourcesarenotcited or
lackmatching.references

Four to sixinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom
othersourcesarenotcitedorlackmatching
references.

Seven or moreinstancesinwhichideasandinformation
fromothersourcesarenotcited
or lack matching references.

Writing
Quality

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to three errorsingrammar,
spelling,wordusage,
punctuation,andotherelementsofwritingAND

papermeetslength requirement

Four to sixerrors
ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength
requirements

Seven to nineerrors
ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength.
requirements

Ten or moreerrorsingrammar,
spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andother
elementsofwriting, OR

paperfails
tomeetlength requirements.

150
Total Points _____
of 150 Points