NR110.507 Assignment #2

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR110.507 Assignment #2 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Analysis
Assignment #2
50
points
Due:
December 11th, 2016 11:59 p.m.
Student
Name: ______________________________
Submission
Date: _________________
Instructions:
Rename this file as first initial_lastname_assignment2_mmddyyyy.
Provide your answer underneath each question. You must upload the renamed file
with your answer to the Assignment 2 tab inside the class Blackboard by the
deadline.
1.
In
a sample of 140 hospitalized older adults, the individuals were
cross-classified by their cognitive impairment status and whether they had an
incidence of fall, and an association was tested between the two classification
factors.(6 points)
|
Fall? |
Total |
|||
Yes |
No |
||||
Cognitive |
Yes |
Count % % |
10 25.0% 50.0% |
30 75.0% 25.0% |
40 100.0% |
No |
Count % % |
10 10.0% 50.0% |
90 90.0% 75.0% |
100 100.0% |
|
Total |
Count % % |
20 14.3% 100.0% |
120 85.7% 100.0% |
140 100.0% 100.0% |
Chi-square
(df=1) = 5.25, p-value = 0.022
Answer the following questions based
on the data above.
a. What percentage of
elders in this sample had a fall? (2 points)
I.14.3%
II. 20.0%
III. 25.0%
IV. 85.7%
b. Is there an evidence of
association between cognitive status and incidence of fall? Support your answer
with a statistic.(2 points)
c. Compute expected frequency
for the cell with cognitive impairment and fall.(2 points)
2.
The
following correlation matrix represents relationships among social variables.
These data were obtained from 793 children in the third, fourth and fifth
grades in 10 different elementary schools. For each of the variables a higher
score indicates more of the attribute.(6 points)
Table 1:
Correlation matrix (Pearson’s correlation coefficient)
Variable |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
1. |
1.0 |
|||||||
2. |
-.10 |
1.0 |
||||||
3. |
-.39 |
-.44 |
1.0 |
|||||
4. |
.42 |
.53 |
-.68 |
1.0 |
||||
5. |
-.35 |
.05 |
.35 |
-.21 |
1.0 |
|||
6. |
.29 |
.12 |
-.34 |
.34 |
-.18 |
1.0 |
||
7. |
-.27 |
-.04 |
.28 |
-.26 |
.18 |
-.69 |
1.0 |
|
8. |
.06 |
-.32 |
.17 |
-.17 |
-.06 |
-.35 |
.39 |
1.0 |
a.
What
is the value of the Pearson’s r for the relationship between “withdrawal” and
“aggression”? Interpret the value in words. (2 pts)
b.
Which
variable has the strongest relationship with “withdrawal”? (2 pts)
c.
What
is the value of the coefficient of determination for the relationship between
perceived behavior conflict and social preference? (2 pts)
3.
The
following table shows the relationship between methyl mercury intake (ug Hg/day)
and whole blood mercury values (ug/g) in 12 subjects exposed to methyl mercury
through consumption of contaminated fish.(8 points)
Table 2: Linear
regression of whole blood mercury on methyl mercury intake through contaminated
fish
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
Sig. |
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||
1 Methyl |
-20.579 0.641 |
30.662 0.074 |
0.940 |
0.517 <0.001 |
N = 12,
F = 75.53 (p < 0.001), R2
= 0.883
a.
Write
a research question for this scenario. (2 pts)
b.
Write
the estimated regression equation describing the linear relationship between
the two variables. (2 pts)
c.
Interpret
the coefficient of determination value. (2 pts)
d.
If
someone had a methyl Mercury intake of 500 units, what would be the amount of
mercury in the whole blood? (2 pts)
4.
Refer
to the data on cardiovascular risk factors (RISKFACT). The subjects are 250
males engaged in sedentary occupations. You wish to study the relationships
among risk factors in this population. The variables included are: (7 points)
Y= oxygen consumption
X1 = systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
X2 = total Cholesterol (mg/DL)
X3 = HDL cholesterol (mg/DL)
X4 = triglycerides (ug/DL)
Table 3: Linear
regression of oxygen consumption on four independent (explanatory) variables
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
Sig. |
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||
1 Systolic BP Total HDL Triglycerides |
-8.131 0.333 -0.173 0.528 0.068 |
2.806 0.023 0.006 0.020 0.005 |
0.525 -0.983 0.759 0.385 |
0.004 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 |
N = 250,
F = 314.02 (p < 0.001), R2
= 0.837
a.
Using
all the variables, write a research hypothesis for these data. (2 pts)
b.
Write
out the multiple regression equation for these data. (2 pts)
c.
Interpret
the effects of Systolic BP and total cholesterol variables. (2 pts)
d.
What
is the most relevant predictor in the model? (1 pt)
5.
Research
suggests that both maternal smoking history and maternal BMI are associated
with the delivery of low birth weight infants. In the table below, birth weight
(grams) and BMI are continuous variables and smoking history is a categorical
variable. The research question is: Does the infant mean birth weight differ by
maternal smoking status after controlling for maternal BMI? (7 points)
Table 4: Analysis of
covariance results
Smoking History |
N |
Adjusted Means (SD) |
F-Ratio and |
Multiple Comparisons Current |
|
Current Smokers |
30 |
2,802.84 (645.0) |
F = 8.36 (p=.028) |
||
Past Smokers |
30 |
3,183.95 (592.2) |
p = .037 |
||
Never Smokers |
30 |
3,236.91 (576.3) |
p = .011 |
p = .752 |
Levene’s
test p-value = 0.968
Linear
relationship between infant birth weight and maternal BMI, r = -0.20, p<.001
Homogeneity
of regression assumption p>.05
a.
In
the research question above: (3 pts)
i. What is the dependent
variable?
ii. What is the independent
variable?
iii. What is the covariate?
b.
Is
the homogeneity of regression assumption met? Provide statistical evidence. (1
pt)
c.
Is
there a statistical evidence of group difference? If yes, what is the evidence?
(1 pt)
d.
After
reviewing the multiple comparisons section of the table, identify which groups
differ significantly and which ones do not differ significantly from each
other. In each comparison state whether the mean birth weight is higher or
lower for each group. (2 pts)
6.
These
data are from a Prostate Cancer Study data set, with a sample of 379 men. A
logistic regression model was fit to the data with capsule penetration
(CAPSULE) as the dependent variable with predictor variables of age (Age),
prostatic specific antigen (PSA), and tumor volume (VOL). The dependent variable is coded as 0= no
capsule penetration and 1 = capsule penetration. The independent variables are
all continuous variables. The data for this study are presented in the table
below. (8 points)
Clinical variables that may predict
capsule penetration
|
B |
SE |
Odds |
Sig. |
95% |
||
Lower |
Upper |
||||||
Constant |
-0.493 |
1.137 |
0.61 |
.665 |
|||
Age |
-0.006 |
0.017 |
0.99 |
.961 |
1.028 |
||
PSA |
0.051 |
0.009 |
1.05 |
.000 |
1.033 |
1.072 |
|
VOL |
-0.016 |
0.007 |
0.98 |
.016 |
0.971 |
0.997 |
|
N = 379, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.183 Hosmer-Lemeshow |
|||||||
a.
Write
a research hypothesis for these data. (2 pts)
b.
How
would you interpret NagelkerkeR2
value? (2 pts)
c.
Is
age a significant predictor in the model? Why or why not? Provide statistical
evidence. (2 pts)
d.
Interpret
effect of PSA and VOL in words. (2 pts)
7.
Suppose
that a researcher conducted a prospective cohort study, i.e. they followed a
number of participants over 10 years in which they started with known exposure
(smoking status), and recorded lung cancer diagnosis (outcome) at the end of
the study. They classified participants by smoking status and lung cancer
diagnosis as follows: (8 points)
Outcome Risk factor |
Lung cancer |
No lung cancer |
Smoker |
200 |
950 |
Nonsmoker |
15 |
1575 |
a.
Compute
risk of lung cancer in smoking group. (2 pts)
b.
Compute
risk of lung cancer in nonsmoking group. (2 pts)
c.
Estimate
relative risk. (2 pts)
d.
How
would you interpret the relative risk estimate? (2 pts)
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.