JURI515 Case #2 – Galloway v. Galloway, 622
JURI-515 Legal Writing and Analysis Prof. Burner 1/28/2024 Froydan Deleon Torres
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on JURI515 Case #2 – Galloway v. Galloway, 622 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Case Brief #2: Galloway v. Galloway, 622 S.E.2d 267 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)
Facts: The date of marriage of Diana Ruth Merget Galloway (appellant/wife) and David William Galloway was June 1, 1984; the couple separated on October 1,200 pl. The husband was a business owner, whereas the wife worked in her former employer’s company after retirement. The husband bought the marital home long before their marriage and then owned more property. The woman received a debt-free house and cash from her father. In 2001, the husband delivered a property settlement agreement to his wife, who signed it without offering alterations or seeking legal advice.
Procedural History: The wife appealed the judgment of trial court, which reversed a decision rendered by commissioner in chancery that claimed settlement as unconscionable.
Issue(s): In view of the division of assets and how it was signed, is the property settlement agreement unconscionable?
Rule(s) of Law: Evidence of gross disparity in the property division as well as oppressive influences on ballast amounts to unconscionability changes marital property settlements. Law and practice favor marital property settlements as they tend to be enforced, unless their illegality is clear on its face.
Holding(s): The Court held that the property settlement agreement was not unconscionable. Evidently, the husband demonstrated no overreaching or oppressive behavior even though there was a big difference in property division.
The Court’s Order: The Court of Appeals upheld the ruling by the trial court, according to a property settlement agreement.
Reasoning: The husband was not guilty of bad faith, coercion or any form of trickery. However, the wife could have consulted a lawyer but she declined. The court stressed that the wife’s voluntary activity and financial self-reliance did not contribute to a conclusion of an unconscionable situation.
New Information: The wife had an inheritance, which gave her financial independence and in this way is another crucial element for the court decision where a factor that influences unconscionability waiting more than just asset disparity.
Questions, Comments, and Speculations: Was the result would be also change if wife has done legal advice or suggested changes in agreement? How does the court establish a compromise between freedom to contract and prevention of unconscionable agreements?
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.