Herzing NU636 Full Course (No Quizzes)
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Herzing NU636 Full Course (No Quizzes) completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Unit 1 Discussion
Clinical consequences of Drug Binding
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
During the process of drug distribution a number of drugs are highly protein bound.
What does this indicate and what are the clinical consequences?
Peer Response: Unit 1, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Clinical consequences of Drug Binding
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 2 Discussion
Diabetic Hypertensive Complications
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
Diabetic hypertensive patients have a higher risk of developing complications with an increased mortality.
What are some of these complications and what is the ideal way to treat a diabetic hypertensive patient?
Peer Response: Unit 2, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Diabetic Hypertensive Complications
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 3 Discussion
Beta Blockers
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
Beta blockers are considered to be an important inclusion in the regimen used to treat heart failure.
Discuss the role of the beta blockers in the treatment of heart failure and its mechanism of action.
Peer Response: Unit 3, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Beta Blockers
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 4 Discussion
Use of Statins
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
Discuss the mechanism of action and clinical indications for the use of statins, considering age, ethnicity, and economic factors.
Peer Response: Unit 4, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Use of Statins
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 5 Discussion
Asthma and COPD
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
Bronchial hypersensitivity and asthma have several treatment approaches. Prophylactic therapy is also crucial in many patients.
Discuss the mechanisms of action of drugs used to treat asthma and COPD.
Peer Response: Unit 5, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Asthma and COPD
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 6 Discussion
Penicillin Hypersensitivity
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
Penicillin hypersensitivity limits your use of antimicrobials.
How are patients managed with penicillin hypersensitivity?
Identify the steps you would take to assist your patient?
Peer Response: Unit 6, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Penicillin Hypersensitivity
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 7 Discussion
Pregnant Patient
Pregnant Patient
Instructions:
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Prompt
A patient who is 14 weeks pregnant presents with symptoms of anxiety and also indicates that she has episodes of panic attacks.
Brainstorm the ideal treatment strategies used then discuss how to treat this patient pharmacologically?
How do these drugs work?
Peer Response: Unit 7, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Pregnant Patient
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 8 Discussion
Case Study on Anti-depressants
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Instructions:
Complete the unit 8 assignment in a word document
Copy and Paste it here as your response to this discussion
Also submit it in the Unit 8 Case Study drop box in the Submit Assignments/Assessments area
Since fluoxetine is the SSRI used in the case study, please respond to question 3 “
What are the side effects of fluoxetine?” with both side effects and potential adverse effects of excessive doses of SSRIs.
This unit 8 discussion post does not require any peer responses and must be submitted by Tuesday at 11:59 of week 8.
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 1 Assignment
Case Study Polypharmacy
Instructions
Case Study
Mrs. A is a 71 year old widow with CCF and osteoarthritis who has recently been exhibiting quite unusual behavior. Her daughter is concerned about her mother’s ability to remain independent and wishes to pursue nursing home admission arrangements. She fears the development of a dementing illness. Over the last two to three months Mrs. A has become confused, easily fatigued and very irritable. She has developed disturbing obsessive/compulsive behavior constantly complaining that her lace curtains were dirty and required frequent washing. Detailed questioning revealed that she thought they were yellow-green and possibly moldy. Her prescribed medications are:
Furosemide 40 mg daily in the morning
Digoxin 250 micrograms daily
Paracetamol 500 mg, 1-2 tablets 4-hourly PRN
Piroxicam 20 mg at night
Mylanta suspension, 20 ml PRN
Coloxyl 120 mg, 1-2 tablets at night
Assignment Questions
Critically discuss this case study in terms of the problematic nature of this patient’s pharmacological management.
Outline some pharmacokinetic changes in the geriatric population that may affect drug disposition.
Outline how changes in renal and hepatic function may affect treatment strategies.
In the drug regimen presented above – discuss potential side effects and potential interactions, if any?
Your response should include a discussion of the problems of polypharmacy as it is related to this case study and the assessment/management and educational strategies which could have been implemented to improve the outcome of Mrs. A.
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to the Submit Assignments/Assessments area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 2 Assignment
Cardiac Impact
Instructions
Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were findings that 38% of adults use CAM [complementary and alternative medical] health care modalities.
Construct a professional paper that outlines how the use of the following CAM health care modalities impacts the cardiovascular system.
Ginseng
Hawthorn
L-Arginine
St. John’s Wort
For each of the modalities the discussion must include:
effect on the cardiovascular system
anticipated benefits
any identified risks or adverse effects
relative patient education
supporting reference from scholarly literature.
Instructions
Prepare and submit a minimum of a 6 page paper pages [excluding title and reference pages].
Format consistent with APA style without an abstract page.
Answer all the questions above.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 3 Assignment
Case Study Diuretics
Instructions
A 70 year old man with a history of myocardial infarction presents to the ER with shortness of breath and chest pain. Over the past 2 weeks he has developed increasing dyspnea with exertion and swelling in the limbs. Over the past 3 days he has found the need to elevate his head while sleeping to reduce the incidence of coughing and shortness of breath. At the moment he uses 4 pillows.
In the ER while sitting upright he seems to be in respiratory distress and is tachycardic with a blood pressure of 195/112. JVD is predominant. Upon auscultation of the lungs rales are heard bilaterally and he has pitting edema of both lower legs up to his knees.
Chest x-ray confirms pulmonary edema and he is immediately place on oxygen.
He is currently on hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol and enalapril.
Assignment Questions
What would be the anticipated diagnosis for a patient with the clinical presentation in the case above? Correlate the symptoms noted with the pathophysiology of the condition you identified.
What pharmacologic agent would be anticipated as the first management step for this patient and why?
Explore and describe any potential interactions of the anticipated pharmacologic agent and the patient’s existing pharmacologic management.
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 3 Assignment
Case Study Antiarrhythmic
Instructions
Case Study
A 70 year old male patient develops a large anterior wall myocardial infarction. He is currently being managed with oxygen, aspirin, nitrates and a beta blocker.
He develops recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia and remains conscious however has dizzy spells and also becomes diaphoretic and hypotensive. An IV bolus of lidocaine is given followed by IV lidocaine infusion.
Assignment Questions
Which class of antiarrhythmics does lidocaine fall under?
What is the mechanism of action of lidocaine?
Why is lidocaine indicated in this patient
What are the side effects of lidocaine?
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 4 Assignment
Case Study Gastrointestinal
A 60 year old woman with a 10 year history of Type II diabetes presents with multiple complications including retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy and declining renal function.
She has not had the urge to eat as of recently she feels “full” after a few bites. The incidence of nausea and feeling bloated occurs at least twice a day and even after a glass of water she feels bloated. She also complains of fatigue and not been able to keep up with daily chores.
A radiographic gastric emptying study shows a prolonged gastric emptying time.
Assignment Questions
What is the typical diagnosis for a patient who presents with this clinical picture?
What is the likely pathophysiologic process responsible for the presenting symptom? Support your response with a credible source.
What is the class of the drug used to treat the pathophysiolog?. Discuss the pharmacologic management plan for this patient.
Outline the mechanism of action and any possible contraindications of the pharmacologic management plan that you identified for the patient.
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 4 Assignment
Case Study: Hyperlipidemia
A 70 year old hypertensive and diabetic male is taking an ACE inhibitor and a thiazide for his hypertension.
For his type II diabetes he is taking metformin.
Both his hypertension and blood glucose are within normal range.
Routine blood work reveals normal renal function and liver enzymes. His total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL) is elevated.
To reduce the risk of coronary artery disease he is commenced on a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.
Assignment Questions
What drugs fall under a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.
What is the mechanism of action of this drug.
What effect will this drug have on total LDL and cholesterol levels.
What are the common adverse effects and drug interactions?
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 5 Assignment
Case Study Acute Joint Inflammation
Mr. Y is a 47 year old, mixed race [Asian/African ethnicity], male patient who presented to your office with severe right great toe pain. Onset of the pain was 2 days ago. Mr. Y denies any known trauma to his right foot or his great toe on that foot. His right great toe is red and became so swollen in the last day that he cannot put on his shoe.
Mr. Y has a history of hypertension for which he is taking HCTZ 25mg daily, Metopralol 50 mg twice daily, and Lisinopril 10 mg daily. He denies any other medical problems.
Results of the lab tests that were ordered:
Sed rate – 93; Glucose, random – 117 mg/dl; Hgb – 13.4 gm/dl; WBC – 8200/ccm with normal diff; Serum uric acid – 10.9 mg/dl; Serum creatinine – 1.2 mg/dl
Assignment Questions
Based on presenting symptoms and lab findings, what is most likely diagnosis that will be made for Mr. Y?
What is the anticipated pharmacologic plan for managing Mr. Y’s acute pain? Provide a justification for the plan including a citation from a peer-reviewed source.
What is the anticipated pharmacologic plan for long-term management of Mr. Y’s diagnosis? Provide a justification for the plan including a citation from a peer-reviewed source.
Identify the key elements of the education plan that would be appropriate for the patient about the acute and chronic pharmacologic plans you identified above.
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to this assignment area:
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology
Unit 5 Assignment
Case Study: Rheumatoid Arthritis
Case Study
A 50 year old woman has had rheumatoid arthritis for 3 years and has been taking multiple NSAID’s. She has taken corticosteroids a few times during flare ups.
The disease seems to be progressing with stiffness and swelling in her hands and wrists. Examination reveals rheumatoid nodules, synovitis of both wrists and metacarpo-phalangeal joints. This is an indication of an acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis. She is prescribed methotrexate with sulfasalazine and a short course of prednisone.
Assignment Questions
What is the mechanism of action of prednisone?
What is the concern with chronic treatment with glucocorticoids?
What is the mechanism of action of methotrexate and sulfasalazine.
What are the side effects of methotrexate and sulfasalazine
Instructions
Prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper [total] in length (not including APA format).
Answer all the questions above.
Support your position with examples.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit the following documents to the Submit Assignments/Assessments area:
NU
Explanation & AnswerOur website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.