GC Protecting Personal Information and Digital Identity Discussion

respond:

student #1

I think the medical industry would be heavily behind in advancement and sophistication if machines like Therac-25 were discontinued because of their problems rather than have those problems fixed on and worked on so that future machines can benefit from incremental advances in knowledge. The transportation industry would also be very stunted in growth if computers were adopted at a slower pace. Planes using auto-pilot, fly-by-wire, and electronic HUDs vastly increased efficiency and reduced pilot workload. Cars use computers to diagnose problems, warn drivers of specific issues, and optimize gas consumption. Ships use computers for weather radar, communications, and monitoring of systems and problems. In addition, all three take full advantage of modern GPS systems that are only possible because of computer technology.

Another industry that initially might have problems implementing technological advancements is construction. Construction of entire structures is difficult and labor intensive, and while there are advancements in development such as 3D printing technology and use of robots to build structures, almost all of these initiatives have only been tests or proofs of concept with the technology yet to make a substantial debut over the industry as a whole. Though that’s not to say the construction industry has foregone any technology at all. The evolution from physical paper plans and slide-rules to computerized CAD software has allowed for much faster planning and changes to plans along with more easily being able to visualize a project through rendering instead of physical models. Machinery gets more advanced as well, though the underlying roles of specialized machines and vehicles remains largely the same. One technology I’m very interested in seeing is augmented reality. The usage of computerized glasses which can project the digital files for a building onto the real world seems like it could be incredibly useful. It could accurately show where structural elements are supposed to go, how HVAC, electrical wiring, and piping will be run through a structure, and could be used even after construction has completed in future maintenance work to quickly locate points of failure and resolve issues.

Student #2

The Therac 25 case highlights the interconnectedness of software reliability, corporate responsibility and human factors in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of devices. It’s an issue beyond programming and encompasses ethics, communication, and management.

Considering where the medical industry would be today without machines like the Therac 25, I believe that in the wake of such a catastrophe, there would have been a reevaluation of technology but not a complete halt to progress. The drive to improve care, enhance treatment precision, and innovate in medical technology is unstoppable. These incidents often serve as crucial learning experiences that shape future advancements. Necessity is the mother of invention, and avoiding past mistakes is essential in designing and implementing new technologies.

Similarly, the transportation industry has faced technological challenges. Whether it’s aviation software issues leading to crashes or automotive recalls due to software glitches, each incident has resulted in regulations, improved design processes, and more rigorous testing protocols—all aimed at enhancing safety.

Overcoming these challenges often requires a combination of measures, advancements in technology, changes in safety practices within organizations, and, most importantly, open communication and transparency between companies and the public. Thanks to advancements, we now have vehicles with features that prevent accidents, medical imaging technology that can accurately detect issues without invasive procedures, and planes capable of almost autonomous flight, making travel safer and more accessible.

In conclusion, the progress made in these sectors demonstrates resilience and the ability to learn from mistakes. It highlights that while technology can potentially cause harm, its potential impact is vast and continuously expanding.