NUR515 Week 3 Case Study – Explain the pathophysiology
NUR515
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR515 Week 3 Case Study – Explain the pathophysiology completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Week 3 Case Study
3 CASE
1. Examine the case scenario and analyze the spirometry results to determine the most likely respiratory diagnosis. (CO1) Explain the pathophysiology of the respiratory disease. (CO1) Differentiate between subjective and objective findings which support the chosen diagnosis. (CO4) Apply evidence-based practice guidelines to classify the severity of the respiratory disorder and employ an appropriate treatment plan. (CO1, CO5)
Read the case study listed below
You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements.
You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal.
1. You must use the current Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the management and prevention of COPD (GOLD Criteria) to answer the classification of severity and treatment recommendation questions. The most current guideline may be found at the following web address: https://goldcopd.org/Links to an external site. . At the website, locate the current year’s CPG and download a personal copy for use. You may also use a medication administration reference such as Epocrates to provide medication names.
2. Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used.
Case Study Scenario
Chief Complaint A.C., is a 61-year old male with complaints of shortness of breath.
History of Present Illness
A.C. was seen in the emergency room 1 week ago for an acute onset of mid-sternal chest pain. The event was preceded with complaints of fatigue and increasing dyspnea for 3 months, for which he did not seek care. He was evaluated by cardiology and underwent a successful and uneventful angioplasty prior to discharge. Despite the intervention, the shortness of breath has not improved. Since starting cardiac rehabilitation, he feels that his breathlessness is worse. The cardiologist has requested that you, his primary care provider, evaluate him for further work-up. Prior to today, his last visit with your practice was 3 years ago when he was seen for acute bronchitis and smoking cessation counseling.
Past Medical History?
· Hypertension?
· Hyperlipidemia?
· Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease
· Smoker
Family History
· Father deceased of acute coronary syndrome at age 65
· Mother deceased of breast cancer at age 58.?
· One?sister, alive, who is a 5 year breast cancer survivor.
· One son and one daughter with no significant medical history.?
Social History
· 35 pack-year smoking history; he has cut down to one cigarette at bedtime following his cardiac intervention.?
· Denies alcohol or recreational drug use?
Real estate agent??
Allergies
· No Known Drug Allergies?
Medications
· Rosuvastatin?20 mg?once daily by mouth?
· Carvedilol 25 mg twice daily by mouth
· Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily?by mouth
· Aspirin 81mg daily by mouth
Review of Systems
· Constitutional: Denies fever, chills or weight loss. + Fatigue.
· HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.??
· Chest: + dyspnea with exertion. Denies productive cough or wheezing. + Dry, nonproductive cough in the AM.
· Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.
· Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.
General Physical Exam??
· Constitutional: Alert and oriented male in no apparent distress.??
· Vital Signs:?BP-120/84, T-97.9 F, P-62, RR-22, SaO2: 93%?
· Wt. 180?lbs.,?Ht.?5’9″
HEENT?
· Eyes: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation, normal conjunctiva.?
· Ears: Tympanic membranes intact.?
· Nose: Bilateral nasal turbinates without redness or swelling. Nares patent.?
· Mouth: Oropharynx clear. No mouth lesions. Dentures well-fitting.?Oral mucous membranes dry.?
Neck/Lymph Nodes?
· Neck supple without JVD.?
· No lymphadenopathy, masses or carotid bruits.?
Lungs?
· Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields. + Bilaterally wheezes noted with forced exhalation along with a prolonged expiratory phase. No intercostal retractions.
Heart?
· S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm, no rubs or murmurs.?
Integumentary System?
· Skin cool, pale and dry. Nail beds pink without clubbing. ?
Chest?X-Ray?
· Lungs are hyper-inflated bilaterally with?a flattened?diaphragm. No effusions or?infiltrates.
Spirometry
Title |
Predicted |
Pre-bronchodilator |
% Predicted |
Post-bronchodilator |
% Predicted |
Change |
FVC (L) |
5.64 |
5.23 |
93 |
5.77 |
102 |
9% |
FEV1 (L) |
4.57 |
2.92 |
64 |
3.01 |
66 |
2% |
FEV1/FVC (%) |
81 |
56 |
69 |
52 |
64 |
-5% |
TLC |
5.5 |
6.9 |
125 |
6.9 |
125 |
0% |
Case Study Questions
Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
1. Are the spirometry results consistent with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease? What is the most likely pulmonary diagnosis for this patient?
2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen pulmonary disease.
3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
Management of the Disease
*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.
1. Classify the patient’s disease severity. Is this considered stable or unstable?
2. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
3. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
4. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
· Provides correct in-text citations for responses which match the reference page.
· Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format errors.
· Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.
· Correctly classifies the disease severity and states whether or not the disease is stable or unstable.
· Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medications identified. Identifies two treatment options that are NOT recommended (I.e.,recommended against). Identifies the correct respiratory condition (obstructive vs. restrictive) based on the spirometry results.
· Explains the pathophysiology associated with tassociated with the associated respiratory condition.
· Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only).
· Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case. Identifies at least three objective findings from the case.
Explanation & AnswerOur website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.